We are writing to respectfully question the reciting of the Lord’s Prayer during Newport’s recent inaugural ceremony. While this tradition may hold significance for some, we wonder if it reflects the diverse beliefs and values of all Newport residents. In a community as vibrant and pluralistic as ours, is it appropriate for a government event to incorporate a prayer tied to one specific religion?
Imagine, for a moment, how a resident who practices Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, or identifies as non-religious might feel witnessing this display. Would they feel equally represented and welcomed, or might they feel excluded from a process intended to serve all citizens? Would their allegiance to the city’s governance be questioned because they do not share the same faith as the prayer being recited?
Additionally, could including such a prayer inadvertently suggest a conflation of religion and governance, potentially raising constitutional questions? The First Amendment guarantees the free exercise of religion and the separation of church and state. How might this dual guarantee guide us toward inclusivity while respecting deeply held beliefs?
Perhaps instead of a single prayer, the ceremony could include a moment of silence, inviting personal reflection or prayer according to one’s own tradition—or none at all. This approach might better honor the diversity that strengthens Newport while preserving the dignity of the occasion.
Sincerely,
Gene Thompson-Grove & Keith Grove
Newport Residents
