opinion Newport Rhode Island

Newporters have been hearing about dirt for over a year due to concerns about the “Dirt

Pile” at the Rogers High School construction site. The Dirt Pile has been discussed in many City Council, School Committee and School Building Committee meetings. There have been claims and inexpert opinions about the hazardous nature of the pile that are muddying the water of the truth. Because of my background in environmental science, I have an understanding of the testing and site assessment process that has been helpful in following this discussion. Here I share context as to why I’m not worried about the process or the pile, which could be of benefit to those who are concerned. 

  1. The presence of contaminants does not make the soil toxic or inherently dangerous to human health. In today’s world, contaminants are unfortunately everywhere, including in our soil. The key factor for safety is the concentration of those contaminants. Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) requires a remediation plan when contaminants are found above levels that are deemed to be safe. These levels are incredibly conservative, much lower than would be needed to cause an adverse health effect. These regulations keep us safe, but exceeding defined levels does not immediately mean neighbors are in danger. Instead, it means site managers must execute a remediation plan.
  2. Harm from contaminants depends on how a person is exposed to that contaminant, as all substances interact with the body differently. The main route of exposure for arsenic and other heavy metals is oral, meaning you would have to ingest the material to experience adverse health effects. We all are exposed to much worse compounds in diesel exhaust, cigarette smoke, and other day-to-day exposures than we are from the dirt pile at Rogers High School, especially now that it is covered and stabilized. 

The presence of contaminants at a building site is not cause for alarm but rather cause for a plan. The Rogers High School site was found to have contaminants “at concentrations typical of the area”; in other words, what we can expect to find locally. The project has complied with RIDEM guidance every step of the way and is handling the dirt pile in accordance with best practices. 

Construction is annoying and cumbersome for the neighbors – just ask homeowners near the bridge realignment project. You can’t turn a corner in Newport without running into a construction project. We shouldn’t confuse annoyance at the duration of construction or the existence of an eyesore with a health risk. 

Let’s keep our eye on the prize: let’s finish Rogers.

Emily Conklin, Newport

This content has been contributed to What's Up Newp. The views and opinions included within are not necessarily those of What's Up Newp, our contributors, or our advertisers. We welcome letters to the editor on current local topics. Email them to Ryan@whatsupnewp.com.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. I agree with Ms Conklin’s statement,”The presence of contaminants at a building site is not cause for alarm but rather cause for a plan.” Where’s the plan?
    The presence of 50,ooo cubic yards of unuseable soil would also seem to require a plan. If there is such a plan, what will it cost, when will it be complete and what will the result look like?
    “Finish Rogers!” Amen. But finish it all, not just the building.

Leave a comment
We welcome relevant and respectful comments. Off-topic comments may be removed.